“Woe to the land whose king is a child and whose leaders are already drunk in the morning. Happy the land whose king is a nobleman, and whose leaders work hard before they feast and drink, and then only to strengthen themselves for the tasks ahead”. (Eccl 10: 16-17)

"When misguided public opinion honors what is despicable and despises what is honorable, punishes virtue and rewards vice, encourages what is harmful and discourages what is useful, applauds falsehood and smothers truth under indifference or insult, a nation turns its back on progress and can be restored only by the terrible lessons of catastrophe." … Frederic Bastiat

Evil talks about tolerance only when it’s weak. When it gains the upper hand, its vanity always requires the destruction of the good and the innocent, because the example of good and innocent lives is an ongoing witness against it. So it always has been. So it always will be. And America has no special immunity to becoming an enemy of its own founding beliefs about human freedom, human dignity, the limited power of the state, and the sovereignty of God. – Archbishop Chaput

To continue following Trader Dan, please sign up for Trader Dan's World at the link on the sidebar to receive a 1 month, no obligation, trial membership

Friday, June 1, 2012

The Futility of QE

This is an attempt to explain what I believe will be the futility of another round of Quantitative Easing on the part of the Federal Reserve to do anything more than to merely provide another TEMPORARY boost to paper assets and by consequence, a short-lived blip in consumer confidence. As such, it is going to be much to the point without any rhetorical flourishes or attempts at refined writing.

I do wish to start this brief piece by noting that I believe the Fed is indeed going to act, sooner rather than later, unless they want to witness a meltdown of the equity markets. Practically, for them to stand idly by and do nothing to prevent it would be irresponsible. Yet for all this, the effort is doomed to failure.

Consider the original purpose behind the Quantitative Easing programs – QE1 was designed to purchase Mortgage Backed Securities which had plummeted in value resulting in a serious degradation of the balance sheets of the major banks and firms that held them as assets.

These “assets” had been originally valued on the balance sheets by marking to model. When the credit crisis began in earnest in the summer of 2008, the world quickly learned that these model-based values were a fiction. The real “market” value of this paper was a fraction of what the banks were claiming.

In order to prevent the credit markets from locking up due to insufficient capital on the part of these large lenders, the Federal Reserve decided to be the buyer of last resort and provide a market for these securities, taking them off the books of the banks and substituting high-quality Treasuries in their place. The idea was to shore up the balance sheets of the banks and give them the ability to lend into the economy for both business and consumer needs.

At the time QE1 was embarked upon, the yield on the Ten Year note had fallen as low as 2.03%.  The investment world reacted to QE1 by bidding up the price of both commodities and stocks and actually sending interest rates higher as the impact from this novel program was expected to be an inflationary one. Yields eventually reached 4% before falling back as the impetus from this first round of QE began to fade.

Fast forward to late 2010 – with the economy still sputtering and growth lagging, the Fed announced another round of Quantitative Easing, this time to the tune of approximately $900 billion. The express intention of this plan was to deliberately push down LONG TERM interest rates and increase the money supply in the hopes that it too would serve to stimulate business and consumer spending and borrowing.

At the time just prior to the commencement of QE2, the yield on the Ten Year had fallen as low as 2.33% as deflation fears were running wild once again. The S&P had lost 16% of its value in the matter of a few months time during the middle of 2010 leaving investors desperately seeking some sort of further action on the part of the Fed.

Oblige they did and once again the equity markets rallied as did the yield on the Ten Year which pushed back towards the ceiling of 4% as once again investors were anticipating an inflationary impact from the policy – which by the way it was deliberately designed to do. However, that was the peak in yields which began falling once again in early 2011 this time dropping below 2.0% before bouncing in a narrow range for a period of 7 months. The catalyst for this downward trend in rates was the knowledge by the entire investment world that the Fed was going to end QE2 in the month of June 2011. In other words, this was all it was going to get – look for nothing else.

Moving to the present time, as the European Sovereign debt crisis has worsened and the contagion effect has spread to China and elsewhere, rates on the Ten Year have now fallen below the critical level of 1.8%, which was acting as a floor. As of today, the yield on the Ten Year has plummeted below 1.5% closing into an all time low at 1.467%.

Here is the point – the purpose behind both QE’s was to improve bank balance sheets thereby facilitating lending, keep longer term interest rates low to stimulate borrowing and ramp up the money supply to produce an inflationary impact to offset the deflationary impact of excessive levels of debt.

One could say that it worked; however, it was only temporary. Operation Twist, which was the last pseudo QE that consisted of rolling the proceeds from maturing short-term Treasuries into longer dated Treasuries, has been an enormous flop as it has provided next to nothing in the form of any inflationary impact.

My question is simple – if interest rates at or near 2% on the Ten Year when the Fed has engaged in both former rounds of QE have been unable to sufficiently increase borrowing/spending for any sustained length of time, what makes anyone actually believe that another round of actual QE, when rates are already well below the 2% level (1.467%) will accomplish the least bit of good?

At some point, you end up with interest rates so low that the money might as well be free to borrow – however, no one wants to borrow or can borrow.

So the Fed can buy another $1 Trillion in Treasuries – how about $2 Trillion – why stop there – why not go to $3 Trillion. What good is all this excess money creation going to do if the previous combination of over $2 Trillion in both QE1 and QE2 has done nothing when all is said and done? Interest rates are already lower than at any point in my lifetime certainly. Has that increased business in the housing market or prevented foreclosures from occurring? Again, maybe for a while it has prevented things from worsening even further but as far as actually laying the groundwork for any lasting improvement, I certainly do not see it.

My guess is that when the Fed does act, and I believe the pressure to act is going to be too great to ignore for long, they are going to have to come up with something besides just Treasury purchases. Maybe they will actually buy stocks or stock indices. After all, if they can push the stock market higher and discourage any potential short sellers from entering, the rising stock market would do wonders for investors 401K’s and other retirement plans. Maybe we will get the same sort of “wealth effect” that we got from the stock market bubble of the late 1990’s. That should boost the Consumer Confidence numbers.

Of course I am being facetious here but if the stock markets begin collapsing as they did back in 2008, can anyone rule out the Fed actually buying stocks as part of a monetary policy response? After all, Japanese monetary authorities have discussed this possibility and been quite forthright about doing so.

On second thought - Why bother – why not just directly inject the money into the bank accounts of taxpayers and skip the usual round of injection through the primary dealers and hoping in vain for a multiplier effect.

One thing is certain – monetary policy alone cannot fix what ails the US economy or the Euro Zone for that matter. The problems are deep-rooted and structural and will require wise action, even painful action, by far-sighted statesmen. Short-sighted political leaders, at this point, are merely leading their nations to irreparable harm and will end up dashing them to pieces on the rocks.

In some sense, the public is partly to blame – they are the ones clamoring for all the government handouts and increased services forgetting that government has no money except that which it confiscates from its citizenry in the form of taxes or from the next generation of taxpayers by deficit spending/borrowing. When its lenders decide that they are no longer willing to lend their capital to nations which follow reckless fiscal policy, the gig is up.

Eventually the Piper must get paid his due.

In closing let me leave you with a graph from the St. Louis Federal Reserve showing why QE has produced no lasting effect....

Note that no matter how the Fed tries to expand the money supply, the Velocity of Money (the rate at which money changes hands in the economy) continues to plummet...

FRED Graph


  1. Hi Dan,

    What if the piper is not paid his due?
    What about an Icelandic scenario?
    What about a default, pure and simple, of the US within the near future, on a significant part of its debt?
    Does it not make sense somehow?

  2. Dan, what struck me here is that you just sat down and wrote out your view of the present situation, expressing your current thoughts. Interestingly, this is highly coherent and one of your best pieces. Good job!

  3. Henri - my thinking on this is that if the US were to default on its debt, the entire global economy would crash. The reason is because so many nations are holding large portions of their national reserves in the form of US Treasuries. In other words, their nation's wealth would disappear overnight. Such a thing would be unthinkable in my view.

    My guess is that they will try to devalue the dollar instead - the problem that they are running into is that as bad as the Dollar is, the Euro is even worse right now!

  4. Laurence - thanks for the kind words. Yes, that is exactly what I was doing - just basically writing down some thoughts I have been having while sitting and thinking about all this mess.

    Hopefully it makes some sense. It certainly is not an economic treatise! That is beyond my pay grade! For the life of me however I cannot see how lowering interest rates even further than they currently are is going to do a single bit of good to cure what ails us.

  5. Dan:
    i want to thank you so much for your work, and sharing it with us, this piece of yours was the best i have read in a long time, simple , full of truth, i come here everyday, and i dont post much because iam still learning, and your one person on a short list that i trust..lol...

    corect me if iam wrong but isnt QE sort of like jump starting a friends car,, it works, but if you dont fix the car ''economy'' wont it just break down again....

  6. why should pm's rally in the face of a collapsing money velocity? how can inflation rise in the face of no lending, a collapsing economic activity? HOW CAN THERE BE ANY CAPITAL FORMATION, INVESTMENT RISK ANALYSIS, WHEN THE PRICING MECHANISM FOR MONEY, RISK, INVESTMENT, IS NOW ADMINISTERED, AND NOT MARKET DRIVEN? does the latter not ensure a global depression?
    this is a reminder that the idols men choose to worship during the night are found face down in the dirt come the morning.

    1. I believe that PMs performance is ultimately a reflection of the fears of fiat currency. The closer it looks like we are to a collapse in fiat currencies, the more PMs will be seen to serve as an alternative.
      real asset investments

  7. They (FED and Large Banks along with the International Central Banks and the MSM) are manipulating everything. It is as if it is transparent. Dan is publishing charts that are reflective of numbers, which are reflective of Policies of THEY. If we do not change course we should all know that the end game is "Socialism". There is of course several stops along the way. Breakdown of markets, Political power grabs, Federal Court changes, Federal Reserve head changes, Political leader changes. We see them all the time. Ask yourselves, Who is the leader now in charge in France? Who were the last two Federal Reserve members just added to the others? Who is in charge of Greece? Who is in charge of Italy? Where does all this go? Dan is extremely astute and is very sure of what is going on. Thanks for all he does!! I have become very educated on the future. Hold that Gold, until the picture dictates something different. Narcisism and Control are what is trying to take everything from independent US Citizens. Thanks Dan!!!

  8. Dan, ypou say:
    " Maybe they will actually buy stocks or stock indices. After all, if they can push the stock market higher and discourage any potential short sellers from entering, the rising stock market would do wonders for investors 401K’s and other retirement plans." and you add:
    "Of course I am being facetious here"

    I do not think you are being "facetious". We are in an election year and Bernanke will do whatever possible to get Obama reelected. We do we have so far in favor of Obama? Not much if anything. The economy is down, jobs are disappearing and the media can not find any new "good" excuse to explain the situation...except shooting down the "bad" European leaders...(what a joke coming from the USA!), the real estate market is still falling despite low interest rates (the lowest in decades)...

    So what is left in helping Obama reelection? Something he can use during the next few months? Something different from the usual attack against the Republican...

    Sadly I would say 2 things and 2 things only (and if I am right it would show how low the American people went down):

    1- The price of gas at the pump. So far so good. The question is how long can the Fed depresses the prices. Remember Bernanke was sayingh last week that the economy was moving forward thanks to the lower price of gas that leaves more money in the consumer pockets.

    2- The strength of the stock market. And this is why I am saying you are not being facetious. The fact is the Fed stats show that household net worth was up $2.8T at the end of 3/2012 vs the end of 12/2011. Here from the Fed:

    "Household net worth—the difference between the
    value of households’ assets and liabilities—was
    $62.9 trillion at the end of the first quarter of 2012,
    about $2.8 trillion more than at the end of the fourth
    quarter. The first-quarter increase was led by
    advances in directly and indirectly held corporate
    equities and mutual funds."

    So YES the value (and manipulation)of the stock market and its indexes will be part of the next QE.

    By the way it is my opinion that if the Fed had given the 2.3T in stimulus money back to the taxpayers the economic effect would have been stronger than the pitiful effect we have seen so far.

  9. Great Post, but I've been wondering... is it possible the Fed's motive is not really to stimulate the economy at all, but rather lock in 30 year financing for itself at laughable levels? If I were a country, and could finance myself for 30 years at under 4%, I sure would. Especially knowing that my biggest hope going forward was a huge infrastructure build to take advantage of my natural gas resources, I would want to make sure I was strapped with expendable cash.


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.