Saturday, February 12, 2011

Detailing the Necessity of Speculative Interest in Gold Price Advances

A common refrain that we often read nowadays comes from "analysts" who seem to believe that they are able to correctly forecast tops in the gold, and/or silver markets from peering into the Commitment of Traders reports.

The thinking generally goes along this line - "speculators are holding their largest net long position since such and such time and therefore gold is undoubtedly ready to top out. "

One sometimes gets the distinct impression from reading their comments that having a large amount of speculators in a market is some sort of curse that plagues a market and is to be avoided at all costs.

Here's a news flash - markets cannot move higher WITHOUT speculative interest and they cannot mount strong sustained up moves without significant speculative interest in buying them. In other words, speculators drive our commodity markets. It is their buying or their selling which push markets up or down.

Yes, there are instances in which we get what is termed a "commercial signal failure" which is generally the result of some event or occurence which significantly unbalances the fundamental supply/demand equation. Such events, which I might add are not all that frequent, will then find commercials, end users or producers, etc, being forced into huge amounts of short covering or fresh buying or fresh selling, depending on the market and the event occurence, which then become the main drivers of that market for a period of time.

Think mad cow scare some years ago in Canada or the outbreak of what was stupidly termed, "swine flu' (H1N1 virus) or a crop freeze or drought.

Generally speaking, however, it is speculators who move the markets.

As you look at the following chart, please note that there is a comparison made of the gold price and the total number of net long positions being held by Managed Money accounts. Note that I have not included the general public or the CTA's or other large reportables merely for the sake of simplicity.

Look at the areas within the two ellipses. Back in July of last year, gold began a stunning advance that took it from near $1150 all the way to $1375 in the matter of just 3 months' time. If you note the navy blue line which details the net long position of managed money, you can see that it increased sharply also, moving from just above 150,000 to nearly 230,000 or so. It was that buying by this category of speculators that drove the gold price up over $225/ounce.



Now note the second ellipse and you can see where the gold price declined from over $1420 down towards $1310.  As you can see by examining the decline of the managed money interest in the long side of the market, the price went south right alongside their heavy exodus from the market. We are using approximates here but the decline was from near 175,000 in late December/early January to about 130,000 in late January. Another way of saying this is that managed money selling out of longs took the gold price lower.

Now note the area between the two ellipses (Oct 2010 - early Jan 2011)showing the point where the managed money net long position began declining in earnest and the price of gold which somehow continued rising.

What has going on in the market during that time frame was that the smaller, undercapitalized public were jumping on the gold bandwagon alongside some of the CTA' and other large traders and ended up buying the top of the market. There were also Swap Dealers who were covering or buying back existing short positions during this same time frame. The Managed Money was selling out while the general public was buying in alongside of the short covering mentioned by the Swap Dealers.

As you can see from the subsequent price action in gold, that buying was enough to take it higher but it was not what I would consider "quality buying". Once the managed money guys lost interest in the market, the biggest gains were already pretty much over. The buying from the other categories mentioned above was good for another $55 dollars or so before it ran out of steam.

Now look at the third or final ellipse drawn in red. YOu can see that as Managed MOney began rebuilding longs in this market, the price of the metal moved higher again and well as stopped moving lower. Once they were done selling out of their longs, there was insufficient firepower on the short side to take the market any lower.



The point in this is simple - Managed Money holds the key to the paper gold market. If they rebuild their longs - price will rise higher and sharply higher depending on the size of that build. If they were to begin liquidating again for any reason, price will head lower at the Comex.

For gold to therefore take out the first resistance level above $1370, which comes in  near $1380 - $1385, and then ultimately make another run towards $1,400, the hedge funds are going to have to get reinterested in gold.

Some of the pressure in gold right now is tied to the fact that a fair amount of the money at the disposal of these funds is moving into the equity markets attempting to catch the wave higher in stocks coming off the Fed's funny money scheme euphemistically termed, "Quantitative Easing". The "improving economy" theme (How many more of these terms do we have to deal with - remember "Green Shoots") has drawn off some speculative interest away from gold in favor of equities for the time being.

Gold will need a trigger or something on the monetary front such as further fears involving European Sovereign Debt woes, spreading instability across the mid-East, lousy employment numbers necessitating further and more extended QE, a sharper fall in the Dollar, another fresh surge higher across the commodity complex, etc. to rattle the cages of the "improving economy" crowd to entice the hedge funds back into a more aggressive stance in gold. So far we have decent buying coming in at the lower levels - a lot of which I might add is tied directly to the very things I just recited - which has shored up a floor of support near the $1320 level which is a definite positive. We do need however to see the type of aggressive build in managed money net longs once again to see this market kick into a higher gear.



11 comments:

  1. Trader Dan has made technical analysis clear to me. I was previously perplexed with all the technical jargon. I am much more confident in my understanding of what moves the metals markets.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent article! Thanks, Dan!

    One question: where do you get the data for the managed money let longs? I would like to see if I can apply this to other markets.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Dan, I heard about your site from the interview on King World News. Excellent article. I also would like to know where to get the data on the managed money longs.

    Regards

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thoughtful, brilliant, insightful, important. Every writing of Trader Dan over the years has been all of that and more. He is the Issac Newton of the commodities business. No higher praise is possible.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the very kind words from all.

    The data for the COT reports can be found at the CFTC website:

    www.cftc.gov

    look at the right hand side for weekly reports for the Commitment of Traders

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's a great graph. It seems the absolute number of net longs isn't really important (i.e. net longs were >150,000 when gold was at 1150 and <150,000 when gold is at 1350) but rather the rate and direction of change.

    In that sense, the most recent weekly increase in net longs appears to be the greatest since the last big move up in mid-August. Can anything be read into that?

    And what about silver? which (i think) appears to be leading gold since August.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Dan,

    What's your very brief (extremely valuable) opinion on PSLV?

    I am in my late 20's and am looking at this as a long term investment.

    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Drew Bill,

    The sprott physical gold/silver etfs you can breathe easy with. Eric Sprott audits them personally and if you have the required amount of shares (which translates to a certain amount of ounces to each that i am not entirely sure of conversion wise) you can take delivery on those ounces. although the best method is simply to buy physical. If you already have physical and want to buy shares, i suggest miners as opposed to etfs depending on your financial situation. feel free to email me at jmmergott@gmail.com and i will be happy to explain in more detail. take care.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hello Dan,
    Thank you for starting the blog. I have been following you for years (JSMINESET).It will take a lot of your time to keep it running daily and hope you will have enough energy to keep it alive (I have a blog too and know what I am talking about!)
    Could you comment on this story:
    "Changes in gold markets make technical analysis misleading
    Changes in the structure of gold markets where most transactions no longer involve the transfer of physical gold make some technical analysts' conclusions irrelevant"
    http://www.mineweb.co.za/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page103855?oid=120464&sn=Detail&pid=102055

    Thank you for your comments

    ReplyDelete
  10. In regards to the article posted at mineweb referenced by Hubert -

    The paper gold and silver markets have been unrepresentative of the larger gold and silver markets for some time now. I have stated many times that it is the physical market which sets bottoms in the gold price and which ultimately determines the real price of gold.

    That being said however, it is investment demand for the metal that drives it. No speculative interest - no move higher. Period.

    The problems with "false signals" being generated in the gold market on account of technical analysis is due to the nearsightedness of the analysts who do not understand how to view a market from a long term perspective. They refer to the daily chart as if it is the key determiner of trend. It is not - the weekly and monthly charts are.

    Over the last decade we have seen "technical analysts" call for tops in the market only to be defeated when the physical market buyers would come in and put a floor in. That is because the long term trend is higher and the fundamentals are long term bullish. Those who ignore the fundamentals in a market, particularly its macro trend, are always goint to misread it.

    There is nothing wrong with technical analysis. Its signals throughout this past decade have generally been accurate for those signals always reflect the market activity of the big funds and large buyers who leave footprints in the market which can easily be read by those who have experience doing so.

    Additionally, while the Comex does represent a small part of the total global gold activity, it is still reflective of investor demand for the metal. Technical analysis tells us when this demand is vibrant, when it is not and when it is vascillating. It does that by leaving patterns on the price charts.

    Related to this is the fact that when speculative activity is due to long liquidation in a market, that activity can also tell us when the physical market buyers become active.

    As a trader I can only tell you that those who cannot correctly interpret a price chart should not blame it on Technical analysis but rather on their own inexperience. We get all manner of false technical signals in today's markets - that is not something that is confined to gold or silver. Learning to spot those and adjust quickly is part of surviving in this business.

    That we are geting these false signals more frequently is due to the fact that computer algorithms do not trade fundamentals - they trade price movement. Those things jerk prices all over the place once they issue their buy and sell orders.

    However, Fundamentals will always win out in the long run and that is why knowing a market is the best antidote against becoming a victim. In that sense, the article is correct -

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thank you Dan.
    I have read many times -your posts on JSMINESET- that hedge funds are not thinking (ie. act/react based on TA or fundamentals) but are "idiots" using computer algoritms and very often they ALL act/react based on these algoritms. Does it mean that IF you had these algoritms, you could:
    1- manipulate the market (gold banksters) in order to achieve your specific goals...OR
    2- use it for your own benefit by buying or selling with the right timing.
    Hope your answer will not take too much of your time.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.